Legal Opinion

Bank of Montclair v. Mallas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 27, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We concur in the view expressed in the court below, that the omission of the cestuis que trust from the foreclosure constituted a cloud on the title of the realty contracted to be sold, and that such cloud was not removed by the orphans court proceeding.

The rule that equity will not compel a purchaser to take a doubtful title, laid down in the chancery cases cited in the court below, has also the sanction of this court. Tillotson v. Gesner, 33 N. J. Eq. 313; Van Riper v. Wickersham, 77 N. J. Eq. 232; Doutney v. Lambie, 78 N. J. Eq. 277; Security Bond and Mortgage Co. v. Weiss, 101 N. J. Eq.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Paradiso v. MazejySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  2. Fid. Union Trust v. Gerber Bros.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  3. Caparell v. GoodbodyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  4. Halprin v. MeehanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API