Bank of Montclair v. Mallas
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
We concur in the view expressed in the court below, that the omission of the cestuis que trust from the foreclosure constituted a cloud on the title of the realty contracted to be sold, and that such cloud was not removed by the orphans court proceeding.
The rule that equity will not compel a purchaser to take a doubtful title, laid down in the chancery cases cited in the court below, has also the sanction of this court. Tillotson v. Gesner, 33 N. J. Eq. 313; Van Riper v. Wickersham, 77 N. J. Eq. 232; Doutney v. Lambie, 78 N. J. Eq. 277; Security Bond and Mortgage Co. v. Weiss, 101 N. J. Eq.…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Paradiso v. MazejySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Fid. Union Trust v. Gerber Bros.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Caparell v. GoodbodyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
- Halprin v. MeehanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945