Legal Opinion

Brock v. Adler

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1937No. 32934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

This cause, in all substantial particulars, was before this court on a cross-bill in the case of Adler et ux. v. Banking Co., 166 Miss. 215, 146 So. 107, 87 A. L. R. 347. Adler, the appellant there, set up in his answer substantially the same subject matter set up in the original bill in the case at bar.

The appellant in this case filed a plea setting up the entire record and proceedings in the former suit and alleging that it constituted res judicata of all matters involved in the present suit. This plea of res judicata, on the hearing, was adjudged to be insufficient.

The present suit was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Mississippi Valley Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Adler v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Fowler v. PayneMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Sterling Products Co. v. Watkins-Gray Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Sterling Products Co. v. Watkins-Gray Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. HarlandMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brock v. AdlerMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Joyner v. ColeMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Willmut Gas & Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1957
  5. United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Willmut Gas & Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API