Legal Opinion

Magro v. Continental Toyota, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1977No. 48466PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Plaintiff, Jeffrey S. Magro, brought this action in the circuit court of Cook County against defendant, Continental Toyota, Inc., seeking an injunction and other relief individually and on behalf of all other persons who had their automobiles serviced by the defendant and were charged service occupation tax based on the retail price of parts installed in the automobile incident to such service rather than on defendant’s cost price as authorized by section 3 of the Service Occupation Tax Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 120, par. 439.103). Defendant moved to dismiss the class action allegations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Adams v. Jewel Companies, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peoples Store of Roseland v. McKibbinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Founders InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Hoover v. May Department Stores Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Nebel v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Barliant v. Follett Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API