Legal Opinion
Nebel v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 27, 1977No. 62872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DOWNING
delivered the opinion of the court:
Plaintiff John R. Nebel, Jr. (Nebel), seeks to represent the class of all persons owning judgments outstanding against defendant, the City of Chicago (City). Plaintiff Lucy Kyle (Kyle) seeks to represent the class of all persons compelled to incur a factor’s fee or to pay a discount to recover the amounts of their judgments against the City. These suits arise from an alleged policy of the City to delay payment of judgments rendered against it for 2 to 2% years from the date of entry. The trial cotut granted the City’s motion to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Fiorito v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sylvia Evans v. City of Chicago, Bertha Balark v. City of Chicago, Curtis Collum, Cross-Appellants v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Evans v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Waters v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Evans v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
- Wenthold v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.