Legal Opinion
Accardo v. Dimiceli
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 8, 1954No. 41459PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCALEB, Justice.
Plaintiff and defendant were co-owners of a parcel of improved property situated in St. Tammany Parish. In March of 1952, defendant filed a suit for a partition by licitation and, in due course, obtained a judgment by default ordering the requested relief. In accordance therewith, the property was duly advertised and sold to effeet the partition, it being adjudicated to defendant as the highest bidder for $250.
Shortly after the sale, plaintiff instituted the present suit in which he seeks the nullity of the partition judgment and the sale thereunder on three grounds: 1 (A)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Succession of GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Tarver v. QuinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Blanck v. SpeckmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1871
- Accardo v. DimiceliLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Tapp v. Guaranty Finance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Gumina v. DupasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Consolidation Loans, Inc. v. GuercioLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Credithrift of America, Inc. v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- National Income Realty Trust v. PaddieSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.