Legal Opinion
Orange Improvements Partnership v. Cardo, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 6, 1997No. 3:97 CV 661(GLG)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, plaintiff Orange Improvements Partnership moves for summary judgment on the issue of the liability of defendant, Cardo, Inc. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion (Document # 12) is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff, Orange Improvements Partnership (“Orange Improvements”), owns a shopping center in Orange, Connecticut known as the Orange Promenade Center (the “Center”). Orange Improvements leases a portion of the premises to defendant, Cardo, Inc. (“Cardo”), in which Cardo has operated a package and liquor…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brookridge Funding Corp. v. Northwestern Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Sartor v. Town of ManchesterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Detroit Institute of Arts Founders Society v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Retrofit Partners I, L.P. v. Lucas Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Golden West Refining v. PriceWaterhouseDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005