Legal Opinion · Dissent

Berge v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1985No. C4-84-2181Published

1DissentSedgwick, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

I

In ruling the stop improper, the trial court specifically referred to the officer's lack of “probable cause to stop.” As we stated in State v. Wellman, 355 N.W.2d 331 (Minn.Ct.App.1984), in determining the validity of an automobile stop, the test is reasonable suspicion, not probable cause. The officer “must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, together with the reasonable inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant the invasion of a citizen’s personal security. The intrusion cannot be based on an inarticulate hunch, and must be reasonable in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State, Department of Public Safety v. JuncewskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. State v. KvamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API