Legal Opinion

Garcia Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 14, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-0508Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILMER GARCIA RAMIREZ, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 18-508 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 212, 214, 231 : U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS : ENFORCEMENT, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN OF THE OPINIONS OF DEFENDANTS’ EXPERTS QING PAN AND JOSEPH GASTWIRTH; GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANTS’ EXPERT GARY MEAD; AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFFS’ EXPERT IN PEDIATRICS I. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Eduardo Burkhart v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Jennifer Mannino, a Minor, by and Through Her Next Friend and Parent and Natural Guardian, Richard Mannino v. International Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API