Legal Opinion

State v. Colon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 15, 2009No. AC 29684PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

In this appeal, the defendant, Miguel A. Colon, claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of interfering with an officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167a (a), threatening in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-62 (a) (1) and breach of the peace in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-181 (a) (1). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

On January 29, 2008, the state, by way of a three count, long form information, charged the defendant with the aforementioned counts.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GibsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. State v. CasanovaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. State v. GibsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. State v. SneadConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SerranoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. Daniel G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  3. Echeverria v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. LamantiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. State v. ShinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API