Legal Opinion
Paul Browning v. Renee Baker
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 20, 2017No. 15-99002PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Judges Wardlaw and Gould AMEND their majority opinion in the above captioned case filed September 20, 2017 as follows:
The paragraph on page 55 of the slip opinion that begins with the sentence < Finally, Browning lists in a footnote of his brief a litany of other asserted deficiencies in Pike’s representation. > shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language:
< Finally, in arguing for an expansion of the COA, Browning lists a number of other alleged deficiencies in Pike’s representation. Because we find that Browning’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Michael White v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Leroy McGill v. David ShinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Thomas Creech v. Tim RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Harris v. SharpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.