Legal Opinion

Schomaker v. Pittsburgh

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1965No. Appeals, Nos. 313 and 314PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoppman, J.,

Appellants are individuals trading and doing business as Schomaker Company. The company sells flour *201and other supplies to bakers. These products are not resold but are used for baking bread and pastries. Appellee, School District of Pittsburgh, imposes a mercantile tax under the authority of the Act of June 20, 1947, P. L. 745, §1, as amended, 24 P.S. §582.1 et seq. Appellee, City of Pittsburgh, levies a mercantile tax pursuant to the Act of June 25, 1947, P. L. 1145, §1, as amended, 53 P.S. §6851 et seq. The tax rate for retail vendors is double the rate for wholesale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Bay State Milling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Kerchner, Marshall & Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Willis v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API