Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bay State Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1933No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaefeb,

May 22, 1933:

Is a milling company which sells flour to bakers in quantities ranging from twenty-five barrels to carload lots of two hundred and forty barrels a wholesaler or a retailer, when it comes to the assessment of mercantile license taxes against it? The answer which springs spontaneously to mind upon hearing the proposition is that it is a wholesaler, because that term undeniably connotes what the company is doing, selling in large quantities, — as a wholesaler. The Commonwealth in effect argues that the universally accepted and understood meaning of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  2. Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Commonwealth v. Bailey, Banks & Biddle Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Commonwealth v. Thomas Potter, Sons & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Fidler v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Hughes v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. MeinhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Buck Glass Co. v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  5. Isaly Dairy Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API