Commonwealth v. Bay State Milling Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaefeb,
May 22, 1933:
Is a milling company which sells flour to bakers in quantities ranging from twenty-five barrels to carload lots of two hundred and forty barrels a wholesaler or a retailer, when it comes to the assessment of mercantile license taxes against it? The answer which springs spontaneously to mind upon hearing the proposition is that it is a wholesaler, because that term undeniably connotes what the company is doing, selling in large quantities, — as a wholesaler. The Commonwealth in effect argues that the universally accepted and understood meaning of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Marsh v. GronerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Commonwealth v. Bailey, Banks & Biddle Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Commonwealth v. Thomas Potter, Sons & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fidler v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Hughes v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. MeinhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Buck Glass Co. v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Isaly Dairy Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.