Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Barrydriller Content Systems, PLC
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
Court hears oral argument. The Tentative Final Ruling circulated and attached hereto, is adopted as the Court’s *1140final ruling. The Court GRANTS IN PART/DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction. Court signs the proposed order.
The Court accepts the following stipulation placed on the record:
1. Within two weeks of today’s date, Plaintiffs shall receive a representation or representations under oath from an officer competent to speak for both Aereokiller and FilmOn with respect to the mini antennae for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- CBS Broadcasting Inc. v. FilmOn.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Community Television of Utah, LLC v. Aereo, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2014
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- P.P. v. Compton Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
- Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Filmon X, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.