Legal Opinion

Wendlandt v. Sohre

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Blue Earth county, Severance, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

The parties to this action had been partners in business, and in that capacity contracted a debt of $170 to William Deering & Co., for machinery purchased. Subsequently the partnership was dissolved, and a full accounting and settlement had, and all matters pertaining to the partnership business, both as between the partnership and third persons, and between the partners themselves, were, as was supposed, fully considered,'settled, and adjusted. But, by inadvertence, this debt to Deering & Co. was overlooked and left unpaid. When this debt became due, payment being demanded of *163pla…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SheldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JouchertIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite Re, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Dean & Co. v. CollinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Reissaus v. WhitesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Kroncke v. MadsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API