Legal Opinion

Cozza v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 7, 1978No. Appeal, No. 883 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Richard Cozza (claimant) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which held that he was ineligible for benefits since he was not injured in the course of his employment within the meaning of Section 301(c) (1) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §411 (1). We affirm.

*607Claimant, who was employed by the Pittsburgh Press Company as a keyroom dispatcher, normally performed his duties on the employer’s premises. He was permitted to select his own lunch hour as his work…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Borough of Plum & Bituminous Casualty Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Rybitski v. LebowitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. North American Rockwell Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Boal v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. U.S. Airways v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Montgomery Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Baby's Room v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Isadore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Penn State University v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API