Legal Opinion

Isadore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1983No. Appeal, No. 161 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Before this Court is an appeal by Dan I. Isadore (Claimant) from a decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s denial of disability benefits predicated on Claimant’s failure to prove an injury in the course of his employment.

Claimant was employed as an “off-bearer” by Owens-Illinois (Employer). His job involved pushing and lifting items along and from a conveyor. In denying Claimant’s petition for disability benefits, the referee made the following pertinent findings of fact, which essentially establish the framework of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. American Refrigerator Equipment Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Halaski v. Hilton HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. DeBattiste v. Anthony Laudadio & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Cox v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Crouse v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holshue v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Sule v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Rossi v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Kope v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Sharkey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API