Legal Opinion

DC Thompson and Co. v. Hauge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1986No. TC C-7286, CA A32426, SC S31602Published

1Opinion of the Court

717 P.2d 1169 (1986)

300 Or. 651

D.C. THOMPSON AND COMPANY, Respondent On Review,

v.

David B. HAUGE and Michele L. Hauge, Petitioners On Review.

TC C-7286; CA A32426; SC S31602.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 4, 1985.

Decided April 1, 1986.

Blair J. Henningsgaard, Brownhill & Henningsgaard, Astoria, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners on review.

Elizabeth A. Baldwin, Astoria, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent on review.

Before LENT, P.J., and LINDE, CAMPBELL, ROBERTS,[*] CARSON and JONES, JJ.

LENT, Justice.

There are two issues. The first is whether…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Edwin Duncan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  2. State v. GardnerOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Pittsburgh National Bank v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Carson v. BrauerOregon Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API