Legal Opinion
Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Orin S. Neiman
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 2002No. 01-1964, 01-2379PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Chief Judge.
Following a bench trial, the district court held that Defendant-Appellant Orin S. Neiman operated a sole proprietorship in 1991 and 1993, resulting in withdrawal liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. Neiman appeals, and, for the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
I. Background
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“Central States”) is a multi-employer pension fund. As is evident from many of the citations below, Central States is actively engaged in enforcing its rights under ERISA sec.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hotel 71 Mezz Lender LLC v. National Retirement FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Central States Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Messina Products, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Richard J. Bot Phyllis Bot v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Daniel Houlihan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Brown v. Astro Holdings, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.