Legal Opinion

In Re Doe 3

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2000No. 00-0193PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Jane Doe, a minor, applied to a trial court for an order authorizing her to consent to an abortion without notifying either of her parents pursuant to section 33.003 of the Family Code. The trial court denied her application, and the court of appeals affirmed that judgment. Chief Justice Phillips, Justice Hecht, Justice Owen, Justice Abbot and Justice Gonzales would hold that Doe did not establish as a matter of law that she was sufficiently mature and well informed to make the decision to have an abortion without notification of either of her parents, and that she did not establish as a…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Twyman v. TwymanTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Collora v. NavarroTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Banda v. Garcia Ex Rel. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Doe 4Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Casino Magic Corp. v. King, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  3. In Re Doe 10Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re Lopez, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. In re DoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API