Legal Opinion

Nix v. Low

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 6, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.

There is no rule of law that compels some classes of instruments to be sealed and others not. There are some classes of obligations that customarily bear a seal. But mere custom will not put a seal on instruments where no seal is to be found. .Even a promissory note may have a seal, if the maker so intends and impresses it. The presence of a .seal, without recitation in the body of the instrument that a seal was intended, will not close the door to proof, by parol, that, in fact, no seal was intended nor affixed. Some cases hold that the presence of a seal, without some expression in the body…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of PirieNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Empire Trust Co. v. HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. ParisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jay's Stores, Inc. v. Ann Lewis Shops, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Marks v. FolloNew York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API