Empire Trust Co. v. Heinze
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
On the 26th day of September, 1907, Ruth Noyes Heinze was indebted to the Empire Trust Company in the sum of $15,000 for which she gave her promissory note payable ten months after date, with interest at 6 per cent. On October 26, 1908, the note became due and payable and was protested for non-payment.
On the 29th of March, 1910, there being a balance of $12,000 due on the note, the defendant Ruth Noyes Heinze and her husband Arthur P. Heinze, executed and delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage upon fourteen very valuable oil paintings belonging to Mrs. Heinze. On the 26th day of October, 1922,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brooklyn Bank v. . BarnabyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Murdock v. . WatermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Matter of PirieNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Farley v. . SchernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- State ex rel. Gilkeson v. HumbirdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cochran v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Roslyn Union Free School District v. BarkanNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- Turner v. PowellMontana Supreme Court · 1929
- Drexler-Rochester Properties, Inc. v. ParisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Sexton v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.