Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Bristol-Myers Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Ross, J.
Defendants Bristol-Myers Company (Bristol-Myers) and Clairol Incorporated (Clairol), appeal from so much of Special Term’s order as denied their summary judgment motion to dismiss the first, third and fifth causes of action of the complaint, which allege unjust enrichment, negligence in the failure to prosecute a patent application, and breach of implied contract, and breach of fiduciary duty, respectively. The plaintiff, Carole C. Wilson, cross-appeals from so much of the Special Term order as granted the motion of defendants Bristol-Myers and Clairol for summary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Manufacturers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Byrne v. BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Downey v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Home Mutual Insurance v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Hwesu S. Murray v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc. And Brandon Tartikoff, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988