Thomas v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
We are once again asked to interpret the statutory right to appeal an order of the Industrial Commission granted to a claimant or employer in R.C. 4123.512. The statute provides: “The claimant or the employer may appeal an order of the industrial commission * * * other than a decision as to the extent of disability to the court of common pleas * * We have narrowly interpreted this provision to allow appeals of only “those decisions involving a claimant’s right to participate or to continue to participate in the [State Insurance] [F]und.” Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by21 opinions
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Benton v. Hamilton County Educational Service CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Clendenin v. Girl Scouts of W. Ohio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
- White v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.