Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Conrad

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1998No. 97-685PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We are once again asked to interpret the statutory right to appeal an order of the Industrial Commission granted to a claimant or employer in R.C. 4123.512. The statute provides: “The claimant or the employer may appeal an order of the industrial commission * * * other than a decision as to the extent of disability to the court of common pleas * * We have narrowly interpreted this provision to allow appeals of only “those decisions involving a claimant’s right to participate or to continue to participate in the [State Insurance] [F]und.” Afrates v. Lorain (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 22, 584 N.E.2d…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Benton v. Hamilton County Educational Service CenterOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Clendenin v. Girl Scouts of W. Ohio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. White v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API