Legal Opinion
Sowma v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided April 23, 1953No. Claim No. 29999; Claim No. 30000; Claim No. 30004; Claim No. 30740; Claim No. 30741; Claim No. 30742; Claim No. 30834PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The claimants Sowma, Martinez, Chapman, as administratrix of the estate of Gauthier, Myrtle Falcone, Micale and Antonio Falcone and his wife, Mary, have moved for an order directing that they are entitled to costs and disbursements in these claims as in an action in the Supreme Court, and that costs be taxed by the court. They have also asked that there be included in the costs to be taxed an additional allowance to the respective claimants as provided for in section 1513 of the Civil Practice Act for the preparation and trial of a difficult and extraordinary case. The claimant Heximer also…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Banner Milling Co. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- United Press v. . New York Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Matter of City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Matter of Water Com'rs of AmsterdamNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
- Easley v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1957
- Decker v. People, New York County Courts1959
- Williams v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1970
- Hammack v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1959