Legal Opinion · Dissent

Newhall v. McGill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1949No. 5069Published

1DissentLa Prade, Chief Justice

With due deference to the opinion entertained by majority of this court I am compelled to dissent.

I am of the opinion that the disposing clause of the will bequeathing and devising, or attempting to bequeath or to devise, the estate of the testatrix is an invalid testamentary disposition as constituting a testamentary disposition made without the formalities and safeguards required by the provisions of Section 41-102, A.C.A. 1939, statute of wills, and not being within any of the exceptions permitted by this section or Sections 41-104 and 41-105.

The disposing clause reads: “I give, devise-…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DeParcq v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wemme v. First Church of ChristOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lowell v. LowellArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ray v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Home Insurance v. LatimerArizona Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API