Sonat Exploration Co. v. Cudd Pressure Control, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brister
This case returns to us after we ordered that an insurer be allowed to argue on appeal a choice-of-law issue that its insured had waived. 1 The court of appeals sustained the insurer’s point, finding that Louisiana law applied because it was the place the contract was performed and was impliedly chosen by the parties. While we disagree with those reasons, we agree with the court’s ultimate conclusion that Louisiana law applies and that remand is required. Accordingly, we affirm.
I. Background
Sonat Exploration Company and Cudd Pressure Control, Inc. signed a Master Service Agreement in May 1998…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Walling v. MetcalfeTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- McFadin v. GerberCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Peter Weber v. Pact XPP Technologies, AGCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Berry-HelfandTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Lawyers Title Insurance v. Doubletree Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Aviles v. AguirreTexas Supreme Court · 2009
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.