Legal Opinion

Speight v. . Speight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 10, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, 0. J.

It has been the consistent holding in this jurisdiction, folio-wing the decision in Graham v. Graham, 9 N. C., 322 (1822), that a reservation of a life estate in personal chattels, in a deed attempting to convey them in remainder, reserves the whole estate, and the limitation over is void. Morrow v. Williams, 14 N. C., 263; Hunt v. Davis, 20 N. C., 36; Newell v. Taylor, 56 N. C., 374; Dail v. Jones, 85 N. C., 222; Outlaw v. Taylor, 168 N. C., 511, 84 S. E., 611.

It is quite clear, we think, that the deed in question falls within the principle established by these decisions. A…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Price v. . SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Graham v. Graham's AdministratorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1823
  3. Morrow v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1831
  4. Outlaw v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Newell v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. . HamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Redding Ex Rel. Redding v. ReddingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Jones v. . WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API