Legal Opinion
Orcinus Holdings, LLC v. Synchronoss Techs., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 4, 2019No. Case No. 18-CV-06199-LHKPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Orcinus Holdings, LLC filed a patent infringement suit against Defendant Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant infringes claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,567,541 ("the '541 Patent"). Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss, which contends that the claims of the '541 Patent fail to recite patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. ECF No. 27. Having considered the submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss the '541 Patent…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dropbox, Inc. v. Synchronoss Technologies, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- eBuddy Technologies B.V. v. LinkedIn CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021