Legal Opinion

Godwin v. Board of Supervisors

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 16, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

These proceedings by agreement consolidated and heard together, deal with the right of a board of supervisors to apply certain county funds upon a bonded indebtedness incurred in improving the roads in a particular magisterial district.

On June 28, 1932, C. B. Godwin, Sr., S. Q. Bunkley and' T. H. Adams, citizens and taxpayers of Nansemond county, on behalf of themselves and other citizens of said county similarly situated, applied for a writ of mandamus and of prohibition.

They allege that they are citizens and taxpayers of magisterial districts in that county other than Sleepy Hole'…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quesinberry v. HullSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Polglaise v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  3. Ferguson v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  4. Norfolk & Portsmouth Traction Co. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mulford v. Walnut Hill Farm Group, LLCSupreme Court of Virginia · 2011
  2. Court of County Revenues v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Sauer v. MonroeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1938
  4. Henrico County v. GradyHenrico County Circuit Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API