Legal Opinion

Rice v. R. M. Burritt Motors, Inc.

Oswego City Court

Decided June 19, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Frank M. Klinger, J.

The question presented is whether clearly visible language on a contract for sale of a used car by a retail dealer “as is — No warranty expressed or implied” may negate the statutory “warranty of serviceability” which now exists in New York State. Although there is relatively little case law on the subject, this warranty of sei viceability is rapidly becoming quite significant.

The defendant, a car dealership, sold a used car to the plaintiff. The vehicle purchase agreement states in bold letters, which are clearly visible “as is — No warranty expressed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Natale v. Martin Volkswagen, Inc.Utica City Court · 1978
  2. Pierce v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Rayhn v. Martin Nemer Volkswagen Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. McCormack v. Lynn Imports, Inc.Nassau County District Court · 1982
  5. Dato v. VatlandNassau County District Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. BoyceWatertown City Court · 1987
  2. Barilla v. Gunn Buick-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.Oswego City Court · 1988
  3. Ireland v. J.L.'s Auto Sales, Inc.Arcadia Justice Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API