Legal Opinion
Meeks v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 27, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00331Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION - CINCINNATI ERIC MEEKS, : Case No. 1:20-cv-331 Plaintiff, Judge Matthew W. McFarland ¥ NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 26) This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Doc. 32), to which Defendant has filed a reply (Doc. 36). Thus, this matter is ripe for review. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Donald G. Wexler v. White's Fine Furniture, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.