Legal Opinion

Detroit Savings Bank v. Towers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1910No. Appeal, No. 166PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 166, Oct. T., 1909, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., Jan. T., 1909, No. 32, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Detroit Savings Bank v. Michael Towers. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Butler, J. The note was as follows: “Phcenixville, Pa., May 20, 1908, three months after date I promise to pay to the order of Woodbridge Machine Works at the National Bank of Phcenixville, One Thousand Dollars without defalcation for value received.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 166, Oct. T., 1909, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. Chester Co., Jan. T., 1909, No. 32, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Detroit Savings Bank v. Michael Towers. Assumpsit on a promissory note. Before Butler, J. The note was as follows: “Phcenixville, Pa., May 20, 1908, three months after date I promise to pay to the order of Woodbridge Machine Works at the National Bank of Phcenixville, One Thousand Dollars without defalcation for value received. “ (Signed) Michael Towers.” Indorsed as follows: Woodbridge Machine Works, J. S. Woodbridge; the Detroit Savings Bank, Detroit,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

This was an action by the indorsee of a negotiable promissory note against the maker. It is not denied that the note in suit, which was dated May 20, 1908, and called for the payment of 11,000, in three months after its date, was a negotiable instrument; nor that it was regularly discounted by the plaintiff bank on July 9, 1908, before maturity, for value, and in the regular course of business. The sole question presented by this record is, Was there any evidence of any notice to the plaintiff, at the time of the discount, of any fact which as between the plaintiff and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Beltzhoover v. BlackstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  2. Phelan v. MossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Second National Bank v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Moorehead v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. State Bank v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Fin. Co. v. Magilansky Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. First National Bank of Portland v. Hartman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Sisemore & Kierbow Co. v. NicholasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Meyer v. ShicklerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. First National Bank of Philadelphia v. Anderson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API