Legal Opinion

United States v. Emanuel Barshov and James E. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 4, 1984No. 83-5158PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERT J. HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

Emanuel Barshov and James E. Ross were convicted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on one count of conspiracy and twenty-three substantive counts for violations of the tax laws of the United States. 1

PAN Properties, Ltd. (“PAN”) and NAP Properties, Ltd. (“NAP”) were limited partnerships formed in 1973 under the laws of Florida by Barshov and Ross, who were the general partners. Both PAN and NAP attracted a number of limited partners, each of whom was an investor in the partnerships. 2 The stated purpose of these limited…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Charles Schwarz, Thomas Wiese, and Thomas Bruder, Justin A. Volpe and Michael BellomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Morris v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Randolph WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael YamanisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API