Estate of Vitt v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
This appeal and cross-appeal raise questions concerning the applicability of the doctrines of equitable estoppel and equitable recoupment in an estate tax refund suit. The district court1 concluded that although equitable estoppel was not a bar to the inclusion of certain property in the decedent’s estate, principles of recoupment required that the estate be permitted to recover estate taxes previously paid with respect to the same property. We affirm. I. Background.
Prior to his death in 1964, Edward W. Vitt, then husband of Verlena Vitt, the decedent whose estate…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Laura Massaglia v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Michael G. O'Brien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Stephen A. Keller and Ethel L. Keller v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Estate of Branson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.