Legal Opinion
Murray v. Fishman Construction Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 24, 1966No. [No. 155, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
On 3 July 1963 the appellee (Fishman) agreed in writing (A.I.A. short form) to build for the appellants (Murray) a house, according to plans and specifications attached to the agreement (contract), and Murray agreed to pay therefor $25,-400. On 27 November, Murray was advised by his bank, Suburban Trust Company, that the agreed disbursements to Fish-man had been suspended because “the building * * * [was] not being constructed according to [the] plans and specifications.”
Shortly thereafter Murray engaged as his attorney, Mr. John P. Moore of the Montgomery County bar. Efforts on the part of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kemp v. CookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
- Harvey v. SlacumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Suburban Properties Management, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Tasea Investment Corp. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grantham v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Himes v. DayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Berwyn Fuel & Feed Co. v. KolbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Weitz v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.