Legal Opinion

Brown v. . House

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PetxtioN by defendants to rehear the case between same parlies, decided at February Term, 1895', and reported in 116 N. C. Reports, 859.

1Opinion of the Court

AVERY, J., dissents, arguendo, in which CLARK, J., concurs. This case was before us at Spring Term, 1895, and the opinion of the Court rendered at that term (Brown v. House, 116 N.C. 859), is now before us upon a petition to rehear. After a careful examination of the grounds alleged in the petition, we see no reason for reversing the judgment of the Court rendered on the former hearing. In our opinion the case was then put upon correct principle, and upon the facts in the case was correctly decided.

Being of this opinion, it does not become necessary for us at this time to review any argument…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cherry v. Slade's AdministratorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1819
  2. Den Ex Dem. Harry v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1834
  3. Den Ex Dem. Carson v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1836
  4. Jones v. . BunkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Mizell v. . SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. HuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Lumber Co. v. . HuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Rose v. . R. G. FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Wilson Lumber & Milling Co. v. Hutton & Bourbonnais Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API