Legal Opinion · Dissent

Roosevelt Partee v. Frank X. Hopkins

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1994No. 93-3512Published

1Dissent

BEAM, Circuit Judge,

dissenting from denial of suggestion for rehearing en banc, joined by Judge WOLLMAN and Judge MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD.

The panel opinion is clearly at odds with the established law of this circuit which, contrary to the panel’s view, is not overruled by Custis v. United States, — U.S.—, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994). Neither does Custis support the limitation on federal habeas remedies announced in the penultimate paragraph of the panel’s decision. Partee v. Hopkins, 30 F.3d 1011, 1012 (8th Cir. July 28, 1994). Indeed, Custis states a different rule. Because the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API