Legal Opinion

Merchants National Bank of Mobile v. Langley

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 3, 1982No. Civ. 3373PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Judge.

The circuit court determined that the ex-wife was entitled to certain accounts receivable. The appellant, bank, appeals contending the trial court erred in its action. We find no error and affirm.

We do not deem it necessary nor prudent to set out in detail the facts surrounding this appeal, nor do we elect to set out the precise manner in which the case “reached” this court. We do quote the following from the bank’s brief: “There was no testimony taken of any witnesses. There being no dispute as to the facts counsel simply argued the law for the benefit of the trial court.”

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scudder v. ScudderCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. O'Daniel v. O'DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API