Dozier v. Crandall
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
The issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing plaintiff’s case on the ground that it did not have authority to extend the time for filing the alias and pluries summons. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Under Rule 4 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, a summons must be served within 30 days of its issuance. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 4(c) (1990). A summons not served within 30 days loses its vitality and becomes functus officio, and service obtained thereafter does not confer jurisdiction on the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lemons v. Old Hickory Council, Boy Scouts of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Johnson v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Lemons v. Old Hickory CouncilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Huggins v. Hallmark Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Carolina Narrow Fabric Co. v. Alexandria Spinning Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re A.B.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Wetchin v. Ocean Side Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Hollowell v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Locklear v. Scotland Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Russ v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.