Legal Opinion

Rapidol Company v. Howe Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1927No. 20548. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

Appellant, a manufacturer of a hair dye known as Rapidol, by written contract, appointed respondent its distributing agent for the Pacific coast, giving it exclusive territory, fixing its discount, and requiring it to purchase a certain fixed minimum and to sell no competing liquid hair dye. After a few months of operations under the contract, trouble arose between the parties, and appellant, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover $9,580.42 for merchandise sold and delivered, and $25,000 as damages for an alleged breach of the contract on the part of respondent. Answering, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blagen v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weaver v. MitchellWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. National Grocery Co. v. A. Santaella & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API