Legal Opinion · Dissent

Elvin v. Oregon Public Employees Union

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1990No. UP 38-87; CA A50465Published

1DissentGraber, J.

The majority elevates form over substance in holding that the Employment Relations Board (ERB) did not exact a penalty in this case. I would modify the order by deleting paragraph 2 and, accordingly, dissent.

As the majority notes, ERB found that Oregon Public Employees Union (OPEU) violated ORS 243.672(a) and (c), *165because it did not follow all of the procedural safeguards that the Supreme Court prescribed in Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 475 US 292, 106 S Ct 1066, 89 L Ed 2d 232 (1986). The Supreme Court devised those procedures to protect the fair share payers’ First Amendment rights.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tupper v. FAIRVIEW HOSP. & TRAIN. CENTER, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bowles v. Barde Steel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Gibney v. Toledo Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Gresham Grade Teachers Ass'n v. Gresham Grade School District No. 4Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API