Legal Opinion
State v. Santillanes
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided November 19, 1982No. 14249PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
This is an appeal from the district court’s order that the evidence which will be admissible upon trial of the charge of removal pending against Bernalillo County Commissioner, David Santillanes, will be limited to acts which have occurred during David Santillanes’ current term of office. We affirm the order of the district court.
Pursuant to Sections 10-4-1 through 10-4-29, N.M.S.A.1978 (Repl.Pamp.1980), the Bernalilo County Grand Jury indicted Santillanes for engaging in acts which allegedly amounted to corruption, gross immorality, gross incompetency or gross…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. NanceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Thurston v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- New Mexico State Board of Education v. Board of Education of Alamogordo Public School District No. 1New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Jacobs v. ParhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. OsborneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Las Cruces v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Cano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. AaronNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.