Legal Opinion

Strong v. City of Rochester

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 25, 2020No. 6:17-cv-06183Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPH STRONG, Plaintiff, Case # 17-CV-6183-FPG v. DECISION AND ORDER JOSEPH PERRONE, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Joseph Strong asserts a claim against Defendant Joseph Perrone for violating his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures. ECF No. 1. Now before the Court is Perrone’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. ECF No. 23. For the following reasons, Perrone’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. BACKGROUND1 On a cold, snowy, and windy day in January, Perrone was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API