Legal Opinion

People v. Johnson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 9, 1998No. 1-97-0950PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

The rule against hearsay evidence has been a fixed principle of Anglo-American jurisprudence since the late 1600s, when Lord Coke, in his Third Institute, denounced “the strange conceit that one may be an accuser by hearsay.” See 2 J. Strong, McCormick On Evidence § 244, at 425 (4th ed. 1992).

The sixth amendment to the United States Constitution, various state and federal evidence codes, and common law court decisions reflect a strong preference that the accuser in a criminal case be present in open court, under oath, subject to cross-examination.

There are exceptions to the rule against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. HoskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. VirginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. In re Jovan A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. OehrkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. People v. DrakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API