People v. Johnson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson
The rule against hearsay evidence has been a fixed principle of Anglo-American jurisprudence since the late 1600s, when Lord Coke, in his Third Institute, denounced “the strange conceit that one may be an accuser by hearsay.” See 2 J. Strong, McCormick On Evidence § 244, at 425 (4th ed. 1992).
The sixth amendment to the United States Constitution, various state and federal evidence codes, and common law court decisions reflect a strong preference that the accuser in a criminal case be present in open court, under oath, subject to cross-examination.
There are exceptions to the rule against…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nottage v. JekaIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. HoskinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. VirginAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- In re Jovan A.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- People v. OehrkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- People v. DrakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.