Legal Opinion

United States v. Jones

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 17, 1998No. 95-8680PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

On this appeal from a denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, we follow the harmless error provisions of Rule 11(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, reject a per se rule for reversal, and hold that when a court accepting a guilty plea fails to verbally inform the defendant of a mandatory minimum sentence, that error may be harmless when a written plea agreement referred to during the plea colloquy properly describes the statutory mandatory minimum sentence.

While on probation for another crime, the defendant, Randy Jones, purchased two firearms at a pawnshop in Sandersville,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. James Buckles, A/K/A Jimmy BucklesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. DepaceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. James Earl SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. United States v. Jason M. MoriartyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. DeleveauxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. David Wayne MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Byron Keith ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API