Legal Opinion
City of New York v. UNIFORMED FIREFIGHTERS ASS'N, LOCAL 94, IAFF, AFL-CIO
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 23, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the award confirmed.
The city concedes, and we agree, that subdivision b of section 1173-4.3 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York (Collective Bargaining Law) does not proscribe permissive bargaining of management prerogatives such as the “personnel by which government operations are to be conducted” but argues that by including in its contract with UFA the job description of a full-duty fireman it did not agree to bargain in that respect. The difficulty with that argument is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & NombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rokowsky v. Finance AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York City Department of Sanitation v. MacDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ford v. Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Grace Plaza of Great Neck, Inc. v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Arbitration between Fallon & Greater Johnstown School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between Town of Orangetown & Town of Orangetown Unit Rockland County Local 844 of Civil Service Employees Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.