Legal Opinion

Shetzen v. C. G. Aycock Realty Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1956No. 35882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.

The ruling on the motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict was not a final judgment but was a judgment from which a direct bill of exceptions will lie because it was one which would have been final if the ruling had been as contended for by the plaintiff in error. Code § 6-701. In the bill of exceptions the plaintiff in error assigns error on the overruling of his general demurrer to the petition. Because there is no final judgment excepted to, the ruling on the general demurrer, made interlocutory by election of the party, cannot be considered. Mechanics’ & Traders’ Bk. of Rome v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. CampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Berryman v. HadenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Harvey v. BowlesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moate v. HL Green CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Crosby Aeromarine, Inc. v. HydeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Young v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Crown Carpet Mills, Inc. v. C. E. Goodroe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API