Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Bowen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 28, 1986No. C-85-3326 SCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CONTI, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a “final decision” of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”), denying his claim for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”).
The matter is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for remand and both parties’ motions for summary judgment.
In order to be affirmed on appeal, the Secretary’s findings must be supported by substantial evidence and the Secretary must have applied the proper legal standards…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Helen Lewin v. Richard S. Schwieker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Jerry R. KAIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Alexandria S. Day v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ceballos v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Averbach v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Sanchez v. ApfelDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Odierno v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987