Legal Opinion

Hamiter v. Torrence

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1999No. 49A05-9812-JV-605Published

1Opinion of the Court

717 N.E.2d 1249 (1999)

Ingram M. HAMITER, Appellant-Petitioner,

v.

Brian K. TORRENCE, Appellee-Respondent.

No. 49A05-9812-JV-605.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

October 27, 1999.

Jeffrey A. Modisett, Attorney General of Indiana, Kathryn Janeway, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, Indiana, Attorneys for Appellant.

OPINION

ROBB, Judge

Ingram M. Hamiter ("Mother") appeals the trial court's modification of Brian Torrence's ("Father") child support obligation for their child. We reverse and remand, holding that the trial court erred to the extent it reduced the presumptive child support amount in an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Kinsey v. KinseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hamiter v. TorrenceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Dye v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API