Legal Opinion

Meinershagen v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. E. E. Porterfield, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The petition alleges that on May 26, 1907, plaintiff purchased of defendants ten shares of the capital stock of the Taylor-Woodruff Dry Goods Company of the par value of $100 per share and paid $1000 to defendants for the same; that defendants failed and refused to deliver said stock but instead sent plaintiff, through the,mails, a certificate for ten shares of the capital stock of the Swofford Brothers Dry Goods Company, of the par value of $100 per share; that plaintiff refused to accept the stock thus delivered and tendered it back to defendants and demanded a return of the purchase price,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sturgis v. WhislerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Shultz v. ChristmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Harms v. WolfMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Hoge, Comptroller-General v. Richmond and Danville Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. GuyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Foix v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Jenkins v. . MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Lauer v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Watson Fireproof Window Co. v. Henry Weiss Cornice Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API